last night i tried to make a reservation at dressler, the chic, more upscale (read: expensive) offering from the owners at dumont, but it was booked solid through 10pm. this must be due to its recent earning of a michelin star, but from what i’ve heard, the food is also fantastic. so i’ll try again next week and not on a saturday night. luckily, i was able to book a table at aurora (through opentable.com), the italian restaurant on grand with a gorgeous backyard garden area, so i considered the night salvaged. i’ve been there twice, but it was three years ago, but from what i recall, the food was stellar.
i let my dining companion select the wine (“just make sure it’s red,” was my only comment) since i didn’t want to emasculate him. he did a bang on job, as it was perfect – crisp and dry with a clean finish. of course i don’t remember the name. last time i was wowed by a bottle of wine, it was at marlow & sons, where i drunkenly used my cell phone to snap a photo of it so that i could remember in the morning.
when did i become an adult? i actually ordered on my own an appetizer of seared liver. liver. the foodstuff i deemed “vile” as a child, especially in conjunction with onions. well, my palate has matured, since i wound up sopping up the delicious sauce with bread, and spearing every piece of liver possible and eating it atop grilled crostini. we almost ordered the sweetbreads and foie gras special, which now i’m wondering about with the intensity of a schoolgirl crush. fie, next time.
for an entree, i went with my usual selection: papardelle with lamb ragu. this is what i’d had when i’d eaten here prior, and i’d loved it. well, the recipe’s changed because the damn thing was riddled with onions. yes, i know, for such a gastronome, i should revere the stupid weed, but i don’t. it’s psychological at this point, since i’ve found myself enjoying things like onion rings or french onion soup (probably because of the gruyere), but it sure isn’t a whim. while i can tolerate onions cooked into things, and consider it a much needed staple in many dishes like new england clam chowder and chili, raw onions are odious and to be treated with disdain. suffice to say, i wound up scraping the sauce (thin, and not very generous on the lamb) off the noodles and eating that.
my companion’s ravioli looked lovely, and it was served with a roasted beet puree in the center, which i helped myself to. i’d once likened the flavor of beets to “like licking the inside of a tin can,” but again, this was before the great development of taste buds. warm, sweet, savory and with a hint of butter, there is something soul-bracing about beets. it’s not just crimson stain on your lips.
for dessert, we finished a plate of pannacotta, but it was nothing exceptional. i don’t mean to sound harsh, since the experience and company were lovely, and the atmosphere relaxed (though very adult, like grandparents with money style, and tattooed kids were not the norm), but the food was not as stellar as i recall it from my previous visits. alas. i’m sure i’ll be back though, but how soon i can’t tell since baci & abbracci is across the street from my apartment.
mangia!